Post by shiha520 on Feb 11, 2024 9:10:52 GMT
Elections a legitimate mandate for the extreme right to quietly expand its murderous hatred, sheltered within the State institutions, which are divided and vacillating, between opportunism that adheres to fascism, as occurred in Germany and Italy and the maintenance of the democratic legality of the 1988 pact. After the main reforms were made, however, comes the Secret Budget, which brings to light a power project that moves capitalist elites from budgetary power outside the “rules of the game” provided for in the Greater Law , when they start to look for a solution to their crisis of political hegemony in the so-called "third way".
The military institution, therefore, did not generate in an organized way a favorable electoral situation for Bolsonaro to be re-elected, nor did it commit itself en masse to his unconditional defense, unlike what had occurred in 1964. The forms of illegality committed in 1964 — military pronouncement followed by destruction of the legitimate constitutional Canada Email List fabric to try to legitimize another — was generated by military and civilians who rebelled "on the Ides of March" against the communist "cause", with the defense of a strong and authoritarian nation-state project, which — according to its leaders civil and military — would integrate the country (through a dated dictatorship) into the "Western and Christian world".
In the case of the rise of the "Bolsonaro regime" — a mediocre politician who said he was a fan of murdering his opponents and said he would come to "destroy", there is a corrosion of the system "from within" the institutions. And he does so with the majority support of Congress and elevates fascism — without the express support or encouragement of military institutions — to the status of a concrete political alternative, almost consecrated in an electoral re-election process, in which he fought to the end to defraud.